The Gearstick Dilemma: Bridging the Atlantic Divide in Driving Preferences

Admin • March 4, 2024

Manual gear shifting in cars is becoming rare, following a trend seen in the US.

In the automotive world, the quintessential experience of shifting gears manually is rapidly becoming a relic of the past, mirroring a trend long observed across the Atlantic in the United States.

grey saloon car parked

Recent analysis reveals a remarkable shift in driving preferences among Britons, with the number of individuals opting for automatic cars during their driving tests more than tripling over the past decade. This transformation echoes the longstanding preference for automatic transmissions in the United States, where manual gearboxes have been dwindling in popularity for decades.


The rise of electric cars and manufacturers' decision to phase out conventional gearboxes have accelerated this transition in the UK. As a result, modern car models in both countries operate similarly to bumper cars or milk floats, boasting impressive acceleration from standstill and effortless cruising.


In the past year alone, nearly 1.7 million individuals took their driving tests in the UK, with a significant portion (19%) opting for cars equipped with automatic gearboxes. This marks a stark contrast from a decade ago when only 7% of driving tests were conducted in automatic cars.


Despite the growing popularity of automatic transmissions, data from What Car? suggests that the pass rate for automatic tests is lower than for manuals, a trend observed on both sides of the Atlantic. This discrepancy is often attributed to learners in automatic cars taking their tests with less on-road experience and road safety awareness.


Driving instructors on both continents are witnessing a surge in demand for cars equipped with automatic gearboxes. In the UK, data from the AA Driving School indicates that over a third of individuals training to become instructors with the AA opted for automatic vehicles over manuals in 2023.


Claire Evans, Consumer Editor at What Car?, acknowledges the enduring appeal of manual gearboxes for driving enthusiasts but notes that on many mainstream models, manual transmissions are becoming obsolete. Factors contributing to the popularity of automatic transmissions include manufacturing trends, the rise in demand for electric cars, and the perception among younger drivers that manual driving skills are less necessary due to the gradual phasing out of manual transmissions.


As the UK continues to align with the US in driving preferences, the decline of the gearstick symbolizes a significant shift in the automotive landscape on both sides of the Atlantic, impacting driving habits and industry norms alike.


Interestingly, the UK is now mirroring the trend seen in the USA, with a significant shift towards automatic gearboxes. This change is evident not only in private vehicles but also in the taxi industry, where automatic transmissions are becoming increasingly popular among drivers.


So, what's driving this shift towards automatic gearboxes, especially among taxi drivers? The benefits are manifold, particularly for those navigating the bustling streets of London:


  1. Ease of Operation: Automatic gearboxes eliminate the need for manual gear shifting, allowing drivers to focus more on the road and passenger safety. This ease of operation is especially valuable in stop-and-go traffic, common in urban environments.
  2. Reduced Fatigue: Taxi drivers spend long hours behind the wheel, and automatic transmissions help reduce driver fatigue by eliminating the constant clutching and shifting associated with manual gearboxes. This can lead to increased driver comfort and overall well-being.
  3. Enhanced Efficiency: Automatic transmissions can optimize gear shifts for maximum fuel efficiency, ensuring smooth acceleration and optimal engine performance. This not only benefits the driver in terms of fuel savings but also contributes to a greener, more sustainable transport system.
  4. Improved Accessibility: Automatic taxis are often preferred by passengers with mobility issues or disabilities, as they offer smoother rides and easier ingress and egress compared to manual vehicles. This accessibility feature can help taxi drivers cater to a wider range of passengers and enhance customer satisfaction.


As the UK's taxi fleet continues its transition towards zero emission vehicles, the adoption of automatic gearboxes represents a pivotal step towards creating a cleaner, more efficient transport network.


By embracing this trend, taxi drivers are not only contributing to the fight against air pollution but also reaping the benefits of modern automotive technology for a smoother, more comfortable driving experience.


The trend continues on its trajectory to full auto.

You might also like

VAT changes and Uber’s contract rewrite — what drivers, operators and lenders must model now

By taxi finance direct team • January 27, 2026
In January 2026 new VAT rules changed how the private hire sector is treated for VAT in the UK. The detail matters: who is the supplier of transport determines who must charge VAT. Platforms, drivers and brokers are now dealing with new tax and contract arrangements that affect fares, margins and forecasting. What happened and why it matters The government updated the VAT approach so fares could become subject to 20% VAT when the platform is the transport supplier. In response, outside London Uber rewrote contracts to emphasise an agency relationship: Uber acts as an agent and the driver is the supplier. That shift moves responsibility for VAT and related reporting to drivers — though many drivers fall below the VAT registration threshold and so fares stay VAT‑free in practice. London remains different because TfL requires a different model. Immediate practical impacts for drivers and operators Drivers must check whether they need to register for VAT, and how that affects take‑home pay and pricing. Operators and fleet owners should review their invoicing and accounting; if platforms change who invoices customers, revenue timing and reclaim rules change too. Brokers and lenders should stress‑test models for different VAT outcomes — what if key routes become taxable? How does that affect margins, residual values and lease payments? How to model the risk (practical steps) Re-run cashflow forecasts with both VAT and non‑VAT scenarios. Identify trigger points where VAT registration would be required (driver turnover thresholds, company turnover). Build contingency for price sensitivity — if fares rise, demand may fall on marginal routes. Review contract terms with platforms and operators to clarify who issues invoices and when payments occur. Longer‑term picture This change reveals how tax and contract design can rapidly reshape market economics. Expect platforms, operators and regulators to keep testing arrangements regionally. For lenders and brokers, the right response is simple: stress‑test, document assumptions, and build buffer into finance structures where VAT or contract role might shift overnight. Bottom line  VAT changes are not just a tax issue — they change who carries cashflow risk. Model both sides, be conservative on revenue assumptions, and make sure documentation captures who is contractually responsible for supply and VAT. That clarity protects drivers, operators and anyone financing vehicles.

What the DfT’s plan to cut taxi licensing bodies means for drivers and operators in England

By Taxi finance direct team • January 27, 2026
The Department for Transport’s consultation to reduce the number of taxi and private hire licensing bodies in England will change how the sector is overseen. Right now 263 different councils and authorities issue licences. The proposal replaces them with roughly 70 local transport authorities. That’s meant to align licensing with transport planning and close gaps where drivers work across borders. What’s changing, in plain terms Fewer licensing bodies should mean more consistent rules across regions. If you’re a driver who regularly crosses council borders, the aim is to reduce the “out‑of‑area” work that makes enforcement and background checks harder. For operators, it could simplify compliance: one set of expectations across a wider area, rather than dozens of different standards. Safety and standards The DfT explicitly links the change to passenger safety. Under a smaller set of licensing authorities, standards for safeguarding, vehicle checks, and driver vetting could be applied more evenly. That should make it easier to trace complaints and to carry out coordinated enforcement where a driver operates across several towns. Business impacts for operators and brokers Operators may face transitional costs: changing administrative processes, revalidating licences, or adapting to new local fees. Brokers and finance partners should model the short term: expect some paperwork and timing risks. In the medium term, though, more consistent rules reduce regulatory uncertainty — which lenders prefer when underwriting vehicle purchases or lease agreements. What drivers need to know  Drivers should watch the consultation closely for changes to licence conditions, medical checks, and fee structures. If you work across borders, a consolidated licensing area could cut duplicate checks and make it easier to work outside your home town. Next steps and timing The consultation closes and the DfT will assess responses before proposing next steps. Any actual change will take time; councils and trade bodies will be consulted on detailed arrangements. For businesses, now is the time to map dependencies — licence renewals, fee cycles and compliance systems — to avoid surprises. Bottom line This is a structural change intended to make licensing fairer and safer. There will be short‑term friction, but for operators, drivers and funders the prize is a clearer, more consistent regulatory framework across larger transport regions. Watch for the DfT’s next announcements and plan transitional cashflow around licence timing.

latest taxi industry updates and insights - recent VAT changes

By taxi finance team • January 20, 2026
The UK’s recent VAT change for taxi and private hire journeys has pushed platforms, drivers and local authorities into rapid adjustment. Intended to make taxation fairer, the rule’s knock‑on effects are already changing industry contracts and everyday economics. What changed From early January 2026 the government clarified VAT treatment for journeys sold via platforms. Where a platform buys and resells travel as a principal, VAT applies. To limit the extra VAT bill, some platforms outside London have changed driver contracts so the platform is an agent and drivers are the supplier. That shifts VAT responsibility onto drivers rather than the app. London’s rules differ because Transport for London does not permit the agency model. Immediate effects on drivers and fares Drivers work on tight margins. For many, handling VAT means more paperwork and the need to understand registration thresholds and invoicing. Some drivers worry they will collect VAT but not hit the turnover needed to reclaim input VAT — a cash‑flow and admin headache. Platforms argue the change keeps headline fares lower for riders, but drivers report uncertainty and frustration. Early signs show drivers considering switching apps or reducing hours — which could affect availability in some areas. Supply‑side and local effects The UK market already varies by city. London’s distinct licensing and rules mean drivers there face a different VAT picture than drivers elsewhere. That inconsistency complicates multi‑area fleets and drivers who work across boundaries. Operators and fleet managers must now plan for a mixed regulatory landscape where pricing, compliance and reporting differ by licensing area. Local licensing reforms under DfT consultation could change this picture again, so operators are juggling two moving parts: tax rules and licensing reform. How platforms might respond practically To reduce the burden on drivers, platforms could offer simplified VAT reporting tools, payroll‑like reporting that automates remittance, or transitional support such as guidance sessions and clearer invoicing. Some operators might internalise VAT at platform level in parts of the business where they act as principal, to keep drivers focused on driving rather than tax admin. However, any shift back to platform VAT responsibility is constrained by local rules such as TfL’s stance. Policy trade‑offs and suggested fixes The goal of closing VAT gaps is sensible — it restores revenue and aims at fairness. But policy must avoid offloading complexity onto those least able to bear it. Short‑term fixes: publish clear HMRC guidance tailored to PHV drivers, encourage platforms to provide automated VAT receipts, and offer a transitional window with simplified registration routes. Medium term: align national tax rules with the DfT licensing reforms so drivers working across areas face fewer surprises. Bottom line VAT reform is necessary but fragile in execution. If platforms, regulators and driver bodies work together, the change can land as intended — fairer tax treatment without collapsing driver incomes. If not, the market risks fragmentation, higher costs for some passengers, and real income pressure on drivers. Practical support and clear, consistent rules will determine the outcome.